coon: is food employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.46
, fur
Weight: 0.37
Siblings raccoon
Weight: 0.34
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.34
, rabbit
Weight: 0.34
, skunk
Weight: 0.33
, fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is food employees 1.00
is fast food employees 0.94
is food employees slow 0.93
is fast food employees slow 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(coon, is food employees)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(coon, is food employees slow)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(coon, is fast food employees)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(coon, is food employees slow)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coon, is fast food employees)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(coon, is food employees slow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(coon, is fast food employees slow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(coon, is fast food employees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coon, is fast food employees slow)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(coon, is fast food employees)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(coon, is fast food employees slow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(coon, is food employees slow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(coon, is fast food employees slow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coon, is food employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(coon, is food employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coon, is food employees)