coon: is food employees slow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.46
, fur
Weight: 0.37
Siblings raccoon
Weight: 0.34
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.34
, rabbit
Weight: 0.34
, skunk
Weight: 0.33
, fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is food employees slow 1.00
is fast food employees slow 0.97
is fast food employees 0.95
is food employees 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(coon, is food employees slow)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(coon, is fast food employees slow)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(coon, is fast food employees)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coon, is fast food employees slow)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(coon, is food employees)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(coon, is fast food employees slow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coon, is food employees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(coon, is fast food employees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(coon, is food employees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(coon, is fast food employees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(coon, is fast food employees slow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(coon, is fast food employees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coon, is food employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(coon, is food employees slow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(coon, is food employees slow)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(coon, is food employees slow)