coordination: be considered essence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.57
, matter
Weight: 0.57
, detail
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, integration
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, intervention
Weight: 0.32
, understanding
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered essence 1.00
be known as essence 0.94
be regarded as essence 0.94
be considered essence of management 0.93
be treated as essence 0.92
be regarded as essence of management 0.90
be essence of management 0.89
be known as essence of management 0.89
essence of management 0.89
be treated as essence of management 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(coordination, be considered essence)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(coordination, be known as essence)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(coordination, be treated as essence)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(coordination, be known as essence of management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(coordination, essence of management)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(coordination, be known as essence)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(coordination, be treated as essence)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coordination, be considered essence of management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence of management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(coordination, be known as essence)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be known as essence)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be essence of management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(coordination, be considered essence of management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coordination, be known as essence of management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be known as essence of management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(coordination, essence of management)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coordination, essence of management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(coordination, be considered essence of management)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(coordination, be essence of management)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(coordination, be known as essence of management)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(coordination, essence of management)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(coordination, be essence of management)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(coordination, be essence of management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(coordination, be considered essence)