coordination: be treated as essence of management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.57
, matter
Weight: 0.57
, detail
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, integration
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, intervention
Weight: 0.32
, understanding
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated as essence of management 1.00
be considered essence of management 0.95
be treated as essence 0.94
be known as essence of management 0.94
be essence of management 0.94
be regarded as essence of management 0.94
essence of management 0.93
be known as essence 0.88
be considered essence 0.88
be regarded as essence 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(coordination, be treated as essence)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(coordination, be known as essence)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence of management)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be essence of management)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(coordination, be known as essence of management)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be known as essence of management)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(coordination, be considered essence)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(coordination, essence of management)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(coordination, essence of management)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(coordination, be treated as essence)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be considered essence)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(coordination, be considered essence)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be known as essence)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(coordination, be considered essence)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(coordination, be known as essence)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coordination, be considered essence of management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coordination, be known as essence of management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(coordination, be considered essence of management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coordination, essence of management)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(coordination, be known as essence)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(coordination, be considered essence of management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(coordination, be known as essence of management)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(coordination, essence of management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(coordination, be essence of management)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(coordination, be essence of management)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(coordination, be essence of management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be treated as essence of management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(coordination, be treated as essence of management)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(coordination, be treated as essence of management)