cop: be called 50

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.62
, tv show
Weight: 0.55
, show
Weight: 0.55
, job
Weight: 0.55
, bully
Weight: 0.55
Siblings policeman
Weight: 0.36
, police officer
Weight: 0.36
, fireman
Weight: 0.34
, soldier
Weight: 0.33
, politician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called popos 1.00
be called 5-0 1.00
be called 50 1.00
be called flatfoots 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(police officer, be called 50)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(police officer, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(police officer, be called 50)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cop, be called 50)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cop, be called flatfoots)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cop, be called popos)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cop, be called 5-0)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cop, be called flatfoots)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cop, be called flatfoots)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cop, be called popos)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cop, be called 5-0)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cop, be called popos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cop, be called 5-0)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cop, be called flatfoots)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cop, be called 5-0)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cop, be called popos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cop, be called 50)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cop, be called 50)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cop, be called 50)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(police officer, be called 50)