cop: wear shades

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.62
, tv show
Weight: 0.55
, show
Weight: 0.55
, job
Weight: 0.55
, bully
Weight: 0.55
Siblings policeman
Weight: 0.36
, police officer
Weight: 0.36
, fireman
Weight: 0.34
, soldier
Weight: 0.33
, politician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear shades 1.00
wear dark sunglasses 0.86
wear oakleys 0.85
wear sunglasses 0.84
wear black 0.83
wear leather jackets 0.82
wear jeans 0.81
wear hats 0.81
wear black uniform 0.81
wear black rings 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear sunglasses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear hats)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear hats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(police officer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear black)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(soldier, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear sunglasses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(police officer, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(policeman, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear black)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fireman, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear hats)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(police officer, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(policeman, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cop, wear shades)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cop, wear dark sunglasses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cop, wear sunglasses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cop, wear black)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cop, wear dark sunglasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cop, wear sunglasses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear dark sunglasses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cop, wear dark sunglasses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cop, wear sunglasses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear sunglasses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cop, wear black)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(cop, wear black)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cop, wear shades)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fireman, wear hats)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(policeman, wear hats)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(soldier, wear sunglasses)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(policeman, wear black)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cop, wear shades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, wear black)