copper: be better conductor than brass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.71
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, metal
Weight: 0.65
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings copper sulfate
Weight: 0.79
, zinc
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, gold
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better conductor than brass 1.00
be better conductor than francium 0.92
be good conductor 0.88
be better conductor than aluminum 0.88
is good conductor 0.88
be better conductor than iron 0.88
be conductor 0.87
is conductor 0.87
is better heat conductor than steel 0.86
is best conductor 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is good conductor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is conductor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(aluminum, is conductor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is conductor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(aluminum, is good conductor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is good conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(copper, be better conductor than brass)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(copper, be better conductor than iron)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(copper, is good conductor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(copper, is conductor)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than iron)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(copper, be better conductor than iron)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(copper, is good conductor)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(copper, is conductor)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(copper, be better conductor than iron)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(copper, is good conductor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(copper, is conductor)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(copper, is good conductor)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(copper, is conductor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than brass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(copper, be better conductor than brass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(aluminum, is conductor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better conductor than brass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(aluminum, is good conductor)