copper: be more conductive than gold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.71
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, metal
Weight: 0.65
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings copper sulfate
Weight: 0.79
, zinc
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, gold
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more conductive than gold 1.00
be more conductive than aluminum 0.93
be more reactive than silver 0.83
be better than gold 0.82
be more reactive than zinc 0.81
be less reactive than zinc 0.81
be more dense than zinc 0.80
be more expensive than zinc 0.80
be than denser zinc 0.80
be more resistant than metals 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(copper, be more conductive than gold)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more reactive than silver)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(copper, be more reactive than silver)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(copper, be more reactive than silver)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better than gold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(copper, be more reactive than silver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(copper, be better than gold)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(copper, be better than gold)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more reactive than zinc)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(copper, be better than gold)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(copper, be more reactive than zinc)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(copper, be more reactive than zinc)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(copper, be more reactive than zinc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more conductive than gold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(copper, be more conductive than gold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(aluminum, be less reactive than zinc)