copper: be worst conductor of heat

Related concepts

Parents	heavy metal Weight: 0.71 , raw material Weight: 0.66 , commodity Weight: 0.66 , metal Weight: 0.65 , resource Weight: 0.64
Siblings	copper sulfate Weight: 0.79 , zinc Weight: 0.38 , aluminum oxide Weight: 0.38 , gold Weight: 0.38 , aluminum Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be worst conductor of heat	1.00
be best conductor of heat	0.95
is best heat conductor	0.95
be better conductor of heat	0.93
be good conductor of heat	0.93
be conductor of heat	0.92
is heat conductor	0.92
be fastest conductor of heat	0.89
be really good conductor of heat	0.89
be best conductor of eletricity	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(copper, be worst conductor of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(copper, be best conductor of heat)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(copper, be better conductor of heat)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(copper, be good conductor of heat)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(copper, be conductor of heat)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(copper, be fastest conductor of heat)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(copper, be really good conductor of heat)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(copper, be best conductor of heat)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(copper, be better conductor of heat)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(copper, be good conductor of heat)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(copper, be conductor of heat)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(copper, be fastest conductor of heat)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(copper, be really good conductor of heat)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(copper, be better conductor of heat)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(copper, be best conductor of heat)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(copper, be better conductor of heat)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(copper, be best conductor of heat)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(copper, be fastest conductor of heat)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(copper, be good conductor of heat)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(copper, be good conductor of heat)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(copper, be really good conductor of heat)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(copper, be fastest conductor of heat)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(copper, be conductor of heat)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(copper, be really good conductor of heat)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(copper, be conductor of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(metal, be better conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(copper, be worst conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(metal, be better conductor of heat)