core: be in solid state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents layer
Weight: 0.65
, part
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.59
, organization
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings focus
Weight: 0.33
, line segment
Weight: 0.32
, heating element
Weight: 0.32
, bedrock
Weight: 0.31
, strength
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in solid state 1.00
has shape solid 0.88
remain solid 0.86
be in state 0.79
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(core, be in solid state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bedrock, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(strength, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(core, be in solid state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(strength, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(strength, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bedrock, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bedrock, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(core, be in solid state)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(core, remain solid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(core, remain solid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(core, remain solid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(core, remain solid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(core, be in state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(core, has shape solid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(core, be in state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(core, be in state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(core, has shape solid)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(core, be in state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(core, has shape solid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(core, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(core, has shape solid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(core, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(core, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(core, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(core, be in solid state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(core, be in solid state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(strength, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bedrock, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(core, be in solid state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)