corner: be in field hockey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wall
Weight: 0.65
, area
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.63
, free kick
Weight: 0.63
, spot
Weight: 0.60
Siblings corner shop
Weight: 0.36
, intersection
Weight: 0.34
, flank
Weight: 0.33
, zone
Weight: 0.33
, alley
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in field hockey 1.00
be important in football 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(free kick, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(corner, be in field hockey)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(free kick, be important in football)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(free kick, be important in football)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(free kick, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(corner, be in field hockey)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(corner, be in field hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(corner, be important in football)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(corner, be important in football)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(corner, be important in football)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(corner, be important in football)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(corner, be in field hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(corner, be in field hockey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(free kick, be important in football)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(corner, be in field hockey)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(free kick, be important in football)