corporation: pay less taxes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.69
, system
Weight: 0.67
, enterprise
Weight: 0.65
, employer
Weight: 0.64
Siblings joint stock company
Weight: 0.67
, oil company
Weight: 0.65
, american express
Weight: 0.63
, chrysler
Weight: 0.62
, ibm
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
pay less taxes 1.00
pay in taxes 0.97
pay taxes 0.97
paying taxes 0.95
pay tax 0.93
pay double taxes 0.93
pay less tax than individuals 0.92
pay tax at all 0.92
pay income tax 0.91
have pay 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(employer, pay taxes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(corporation, pay less taxes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(employer, pay taxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(employer, pay taxes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(employer, pay taxes)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(corporation, pay less taxes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(corporation, pay less taxes)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(corporation, pay income tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(corporation, pay income tax)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(corporation, pay income tax)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(corporation, pay income tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(corporation, pay less taxes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(corporation, pay less taxes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employer, pay taxes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(corporation, pay less taxes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employer, pay taxes)