corruption: be endemic in nigeria

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be endemic in nigeria 1.00
be problem in nigeria 0.92
be in nigeria 0.91
be endemic in indonesia 0.89
be rampant in kenya 0.82
exist in zambia 0.81
be prevalent in france 0.80
be in sub-saharan africa 0.80
be in africa 0.80
be prevalent in europe 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in zambia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(poverty, exist in zambia)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in zambia)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in nigeria)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in nigeria)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(corruption, be in nigeria)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(corruption, be in nigeria)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in zambia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)