corruption: be in country measured

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in country measured 1.00
be is measured 0.93
be measured 0.92
be in country 0.81
affect country 0.78
be calculated 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(crime, be measured)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be in country measured)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(crime, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(crime, be measured)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(crime, be measured)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in country measured)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(corruption, be in country measured)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(corruption, be is measured)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(corruption, be measured)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(corruption, be is measured)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(corruption, be measured)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(corruption, be in country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(corruption, be measured)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(corruption, be is measured)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(corruption, be in country)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(corruption, affect country)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be measured)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(corruption, affect country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(corruption, affect country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(corruption, affect country)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be is measured)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in country measured)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be in country measured)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(crime, be measured)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be in country measured)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(crime, be measured)