corruption: be problem in developing countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in developing countries 1.00
be problem in countries 0.94
be common in countries 0.84
be problem in communities 0.80
be problem in united states 0.79
has state problem 0.78
be perceived as working class problem 0.78
is global issue 0.78
be common in african countries 0.77
create problems 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is global issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(terrorism, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(terrorism, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(poverty, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, is global issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in countries)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(corruption, be common in countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(corruption, be common in countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(corruption, be common in african countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(corruption, be common in countries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is global issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(corruption, is global issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in countries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(corruption, be common in african countries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(corruption, is global issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(corruption, is global issue)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(corruption, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in countries)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(terrorism, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(poverty, is global issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(corruption, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)