corruption: be problem in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in india 1.00
be in india 0.92
be problem in south africa 0.84
be problem in philippines 0.84
was problem in london 0.84
be problem in nigeria 0.84
be issue in australia 0.81
be problem in jakarta 0.81
be reduced in future in india 0.80
be in america 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(crime, was problem in london)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be in india)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(evil, be in india)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(evil, be in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be issue in australia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be in india)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(crime, was problem in london)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(terrorism, be issue in australia)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be issue in australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in india)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in india)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in india)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(corruption, be in india)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(corruption, be in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, be in india)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(terrorism, be issue in australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, be in india)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in london)