corruption: be problem in nigeria

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in nigeria 1.00
be in nigeria 0.96
be endemic in nigeria 0.92
be problem in india 0.84
be problem in south africa 0.81
was problem in london 0.81
be problem in jakarta 0.81
exist in zambia 0.78
be in zimbabwe 0.78
be in sub-saharan africa 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(crime, was problem in london)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in zambia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in jakarta)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(crime, was problem in london)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(poverty, exist in zambia)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in zambia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in nigeria)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in nigeria)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(corruption, be in nigeria)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in nigeria)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(corruption, be in nigeria)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in zambia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in london)