corruption: be problem in philippines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in philippines 1.00
be rampant in philippines 0.90
be unwanted activity in philippines 0.84
be problem in india 0.84
be issue in australia 0.79
be problem in jakarta 0.79
be problem in nigeria 0.77
was problem in london 0.77
be problem in south africa 0.76
exist in canada 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(crime, was problem in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be issue in australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in jakarta)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(crime, was problem in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(terrorism, be issue in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be issue in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in jakarta) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in nigeria)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in india)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(terrorism, be issue in australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in jakarta)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in london)