corruption: be rampant in kenya

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rampant in kenya 1.00
be rampant in philippines 0.87
be rampant today world 0.87
be endemic in indonesia 0.83
be endemic in nigeria 0.82
be in zimbabwe 0.79
happen in zimbabwe 0.78
exist in zimbabwe 0.77
be high in africa 0.77
be problem in south africa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in africa)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant today world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant today world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant today world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant today world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines)