corruption: be rampant in philippines

Related concepts

Parents	evil Weight: 0.64 , obstacle Weight: 0.61 , crime Weight: 0.61 , factor Weight: 0.61 , theme Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bribery Weight: 0.35 , terrorism Weight: 0.35 , fraud Weight: 0.34 , poverty Weight: 0.33 , hypocrisy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be rampant in philippines	1.00
be problem in philippines	0.90
be rampant in kenya	0.87
be rampant today world	0.84
be unwanted activity in philippines	0.83
be endemic in indonesia	0.79
be prevalent in uk	0.78
be endemic in nigeria	0.77
be prevalent in europe	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in kenya)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in kenya)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in kenya)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant today world)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant today world)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant today world)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in kenya)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant today world)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in indonesia)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)