corruption: be unwanted activity in philippines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be unwanted activity in philippines 1.00
be problem in philippines 0.84
be rampant in philippines 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in philippines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in philippines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in philippines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, be rampant in philippines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in philippines)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(corruption, be rampant in philippines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be unwanted activity in philippines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines)