corruption: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
get bad 0.83
affect quality 0.81
be bad for business 0.80
has quality evil 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
have taste good 0.79
is bad thing 0.79
be superior to good 0.78
was bad during great depression 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(evil, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be superior to good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, have taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, be superior to good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, have taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, be superior to good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hypocrisy, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(evil, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be superior to good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(terrorism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bribery, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hypocrisy, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hypocrisy, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bribery, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bribery, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(corruption, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be bad for business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(corruption, be bad for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(corruption, be bad for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(corruption, be bad for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(evil, be superior to good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hypocrisy, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hypocrisy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(terrorism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bribery, be bad for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(evil, be superior to good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)