corruption: has state problem

Related concepts

Parents	evil Weight: 0.64 , obstacle Weight: 0.61 , crime Weight: 0.61 , factor Weight: 0.61 , theme Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bribery Weight: 0.35 , terrorism Weight: 0.35 , fraud Weight: 0.34 , poverty Weight: 0.33 , hypocrisy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state problem	1.00
is social problem	0.85
be seen as problem	0.85
be problem in countries	0.84
fear of is serious problem	0.84
has state concern	0.84
has state challenge	0.83
is suddenly big problem	0.83
be problem in communities	0.82
be problem in united states	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(evil, is suddenly big problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(evil, is suddenly big problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(evil, is suddenly big problem)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(terrorism, has state problem)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state challenge)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(evil, is suddenly big problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(terrorism, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(terrorism, has state problem)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(poverty, has state challenge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(poverty, has state challenge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(corruption, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(corruption, be problem in countries)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be problem in countries)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(corruption, be problem in countries)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(corruption, be problem in countries)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(corruption, is social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(evil, is suddenly big problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(terrorism, has state problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(poverty, has state challenge)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(corruption, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(evil, is suddenly big problem)