corruption: increase

Related concepts

Parents	evil Weight: 0.64 , obstacle Weight: 0.61 , crime Weight: 0.61 , factor Weight: 0.61 , theme Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bribery Weight: 0.35 , terrorism Weight: 0.35 , fraud Weight: 0.34 , poverty Weight: 0.33 , hypocrisy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
increase	1.00
work together increase	0.83
increase in america	0.81
be on rise	0.80
increase in uk	0.80
decrease in america	0.80
increase in nepal	0.80
increase under leaders	0.79
be reduced	0.77
increase in london	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(crime, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(corruption, increase)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(factor, work together increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(corruption, increase)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(corruption, increase)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(crime, be on rise) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(corruption, increase)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(crime, increase in london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(corruption, increase)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(crime, be on rise)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(crime, increase)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(crime, increase in london)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(factor, work together increase)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(crime, increase in uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in london)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(crime, be on rise)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in uk)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(crime, increase)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(factor, work together increase)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be on rise)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(crime, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(corruption, increase)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(factor, work together increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(corruption, increase)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(crime, be on rise) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(corruption, increase)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(crime, increase in uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(corruption, increase)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(crime, increase in london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(corruption, increase)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(terrorism, be on rise) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(terrorism, be on rise)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(poverty, increase in uk)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(poverty, be reduced) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(corruption, increase)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase in nepal)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(corruption, increase in nepal)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(corruption, increase in nepal)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(corruption, increase in nepal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(corruption, increase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(crime, increase)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(crime, be on rise)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(crime, increase in london)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(terrorism, be on rise)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(crime, increase)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(crime, be on rise)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(crime, increase in london)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(corruption, increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(crime, increase in uk)