corruption: is legal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is legal 1.00
be legal in america 0.82
be legal in america for politicians 0.78
be legal in new zealand 0.77
be legal in zealand 0.77
be legal in purge 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in new zealand)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be legal in america for politicians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bribery, be legal in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bribery, be legal in america)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bribery, be legal in zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(bribery, be legal in zealand)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(bribery, be legal in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bribery, be legal in new zealand)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(bribery, be legal in america for politicians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bribery, be legal in america for politicians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(corruption, is legal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, is legal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in zealand)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in america for politicians)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is legal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bribery, be legal in new zealand)