corruption: voting behavior

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
voting behavior 1.00
affect voting 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(corruption, voting behavior)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(corruption, voting behavior)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(corruption, voting behavior)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(corruption, affect voting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(corruption, voting behavior)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(corruption, affect voting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(corruption, voting behavior)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(corruption, affect voting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(corruption, voting behavior)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(corruption, affect voting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(corruption, voting behavior)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(corruption, voting behavior)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(corruption, voting behavior)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(corruption, voting behavior)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(corruption, voting behavior)