cost benefit analysis: is subjective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents analysis
Weight: 0.76
, study
Weight: 0.64
, method
Weight: 0.55
, operation
Weight: 0.55
, tool
Weight: 0.55
Siblings report
Weight: 0.34
, review
Weight: 0.33
, insight
Weight: 0.33
, operating system
Weight: 0.32
, free software
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is subjective 1.00
correct for non variables 0.77
correct for variables 0.77
correct for non tested variables 0.76
correct for tested variables 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(study, correct for non tested variables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cost benefit analysis, is subjective)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(study, correct for non tested variables)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(study, correct for non tested variables)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(study, correct for non tested variables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cost benefit analysis, is subjective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cost benefit analysis, is subjective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cost benefit analysis, is subjective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cost benefit analysis, is subjective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(study, correct for non tested variables)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(cost benefit analysis, is subjective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(study, correct for non tested variables)