cost: be insufficient measure of value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be insufficient measure of value 1.00
is necessary 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tuition, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(deductible, is necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(deductible, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(deductible, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tuition, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tuition, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(income tax, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cost, be insufficient measure of value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, be insufficient measure of value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cost, be insufficient measure of value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(deductible, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tuition, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(income tax, is necessary)