cough: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, complaint
Weight: 0.58
, common cold
Weight: 0.58
, infection
Weight: 0.57
Siblings coughing
Weight: 0.34
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.34
, rheumatic fever
Weight: 0.34
, bronchitis
Weight: 0.34
, sneezing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
be good 0.86
has quality worse 0.84
feel good 0.80
be good for business 0.80
is good thing 0.78
has quality definition 0.76
feels good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(complaint, be good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(complaint, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(complaint, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(infection, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(complaint, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(infection, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sneezing, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sneezing, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diarrhea, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coughing, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sneezing, feels good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(complaint, be good)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(complaint, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sneezing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sneezing, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coughing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(coughing, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(diarrhea, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bronchitis, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(coughing, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(coughing, has quality worse)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(sneezing, feel good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(sneezing, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(diarrhea, feel good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(diarrhea, feel good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(coughing, feel good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(coughing, feel good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bronchitis, has quality worse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(sneezing, feels good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(sneezing, feels good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cough, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cough, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cough, has quality worse)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(cough, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cough, has quality worse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sneezing, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(coughing, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sneezing, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(diarrhea, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sneezing, feels good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(coughing, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coughing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bronchitis, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diarrhea, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coughing, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bronchitis, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)