coughing: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reflex
Weight: 0.57
, symptom
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, sound
Weight: 0.54
, sign
Weight: 0.54
Siblings sneezing
Weight: 0.35
, cough
Weight: 0.34
, phlegm
Weight: 0.33
, shortness
Weight: 0.32
, breathing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coughing, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sneezing, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sneezing, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cough, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(shortness, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sneezing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sneezing, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cough, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(shortness, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(shortness, has quality worse)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cough, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cough, has quality worse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(sneezing, feel good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(sneezing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(coughing, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(coughing, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(coughing, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(coughing, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(coughing, has quality worse)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coughing, has quality worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(coughing, has quality worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(coughing, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(coughing, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coughing, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(coughing, feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coughing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sneezing, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sneezing, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(shortness, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cough, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cough, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coughing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)