council: be at council chamber

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents authority
Weight: 0.71
, city
Weight: 0.67
, committee
Weight: 0.65
, organization
Weight: 0.64
Siblings town
Weight: 0.64
, senate
Weight: 0.63
, brent
Weight: 0.44
, quebec city
Weight: 0.36
, board
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at council chamber 1.00
be at city council meet 0.88
be at council build 0.88
be at city hall 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(committee, be at city council meet)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(council, be at council chamber)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(council, be at council chamber)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(committee, be at city council meet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(committee, be at city hall)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city hall)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(committee, be at city council meet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(committee, be at city council meet)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(council, be at council chamber)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(committee, be at city hall)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(council, be at council chamber)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(council, be at council chamber)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(council, be at council build)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council build)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(council, be at council build)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(council, be at city hall)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(council, be at city hall)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(council, be at city hall)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(council, be at city hall)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(council, be at council build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(council, be at council chamber)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(committee, be at city council meet)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(committee, be at city hall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(committee, be at city council meet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(council, be at council chamber)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(committee, be at city hall)