council: is district map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents authority
Weight: 0.71
, city
Weight: 0.67
, resolution
Weight: 0.67
, committee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings senate
Weight: 0.63
, trent
Weight: 0.56
, brent
Weight: 0.44
, commission
Weight: 0.39
, quebec city
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is district map 1.00
is districts 0.83
is city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(council, is district map)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(council, is district map)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(council, is district map)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(council, is districts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(council, is city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(council, is districts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(council, is districts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(council, is city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(council, is city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(council, is districts)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(council, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(council, is district map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(council, is district map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(council, is district map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)