counselor: have code of ethics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.65
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.62
, professional
Weight: 0.62
Siblings psychologist
Weight: 0.70
, homeless person
Weight: 0.35
, instructor
Weight: 0.35
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.34
, administrator
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have code of ethics 1.00
have ethics 0.93
have code 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(counselor, have code of ethics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(professional, have code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(counselor, have code of ethics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(professional, have code of ethics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(professional, have code)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(professional, have code)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(counselor, have code of ethics)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(professional, have code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(counselor, have code of ethics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(counselor, have code of ethics)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(counselor, have ethics)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(counselor, have ethics)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(counselor, have code)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(counselor, have code)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(counselor, have ethics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(counselor, have ethics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(counselor, have code)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(counselor, have code)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(counselor, have code of ethics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(professional, have code of ethics)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(professional, have code)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(professional, have code of ethics)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(counselor, have code of ethics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(professional, have code)