counting: is difficult job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.54
, function
Weight: 0.54
, work
Weight: 0.53
, topic
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, only
Weight: 0.31
, swing
Weight: 0.31
, running
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult job 1.00
has state job 0.87
is hard 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(counting, is difficult job)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(work, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(counting, is difficult job)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(counting, is difficult job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(work, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(work, is hard)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(talking, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(running, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(counting, is difficult job)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(work, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(counting, is difficult job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(counting, is difficult job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(talking, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(talking, is hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(running, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(running, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(counting, is difficult job)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(counting, has state job)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(counting, has state job)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(counting, has state job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(counting, is hard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(counting, is hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(counting, is hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(counting, has state job)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(counting, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(counting, is difficult job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(work, is hard)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(talking, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(running, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(work, is hard)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(counting, is difficult job) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)