country music: be better than pop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents song
Weight: 0.73
, classical music
Weight: 0.73
, pop music
Weight: 0.70
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, musician
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hank williams
Weight: 0.60
, love song
Weight: 0.38
, rap music
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than pop 1.00
be better than pop music 0.96
be better than rap 0.86
get bad rap 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pop music, be better than rap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(country music, be better than pop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pop music, be better than rap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be better than rap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pop music, be better than rap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(country music, be better than pop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(country music, be better than pop)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(country music, be better than pop music)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(country music, be better than pop music)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(country music, be better than pop music)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(country music, be better than rap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(country music, get bad rap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(country music, be better than rap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(country music, be better than rap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(country music, be better than rap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(country music, get bad rap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(country music, be better than pop music)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(country music, get bad rap)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(country music, get bad rap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(country music, be better than pop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(country music, be better than pop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(country music, be better than pop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pop music, be better than rap)