country music: has quality worst

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents song
Weight: 0.73
, classical music
Weight: 0.73
, pop music
Weight: 0.70
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, musician
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hank williams
Weight: 0.60
, love song
Weight: 0.38
, rap music
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worst 1.00
has quality bad 0.83
is best 0.82
has quality good 0.80
is terrible 0.78
is horrible 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(classical music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pop music, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pop music, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pop music, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(classical music, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pop music, is horrible)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pop music, is terrible)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is horrible)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is terrible)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is best)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is best)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(love song, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(classical music, is best)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pop music, is best)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pop music, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pop music, is horrible)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality worst)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rap music, is best)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rap music, is best)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(love song, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(love song, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(country music, has quality worst)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(country music, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(country music, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, is best)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(country music, is best)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(country music, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(country music, is terrible)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(country music, is terrible)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(country music, is best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(country music, is horrible)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(country music, is horrible)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(country music, is terrible)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(country music, is horrible)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(country music, is horrible)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(country music, is terrible)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(country music, is best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(country music, has quality worst)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pop music, is horrible)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pop music, is terrible)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is best)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(love song, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rap music, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pop music, is best)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(classical music, is best)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pop music, is terrible)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(country music, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pop music, is horrible)