county: be at state

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school district
Weight: 0.73
, state
Weight: 0.69
, town
Weight: 0.66
, office
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sheriff
Weight: 0.73
, public library
Weight: 0.65
, jefferson
Weight: 0.61
, sacramento
Weight: 0.60
, union
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at state 1.00
be at any state 0.89
bring on other state 0.82
be at county 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(town, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(county, be at state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(town, be at any state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(county, be at state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(state, bring on other state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(county, be at state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(town, be at county) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(county, be at state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(town, be at any state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(town, be at state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(state, bring on other state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(town, be at county)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(town, be at any state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(town, be at county)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(town, be at state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(state, bring on other state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(town, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(county, be at state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(town, be at any state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(county, be at state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(state, bring on other state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(county, be at state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(town, be at county) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(county, be at state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(county, be at state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(county, be at state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(town, be at state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(state, bring on other state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(town, be at any state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(town, be at county)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(town, be at state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(state, bring on other state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(town, be at any state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(county, be at state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(town, be at county)