coupling: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.57
, mechanism
Weight: 0.55
, application
Weight: 0.53
, show
Weight: 0.52
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, attachment
Weight: 0.32
, integration
Weight: 0.32
, separation
Weight: 0.32
, recombination
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality difference 0.80
be in great shape now 0.80
be in great shape 0.79
is filering better 0.78
is good thing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(coupling, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(coupling, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(coupling, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(show, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(separation, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(separation, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(integration, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(separation, is filering better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(attachment, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(integration, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(coupling, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(coupling, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(coupling, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(integration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(integration, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(separation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(separation, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(separation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(separation, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(integration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(integration, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(attachment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(attachment, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(integration, is good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(separation, is filering better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(separation, is filering better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(coupling, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(coupling, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(coupling, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coupling, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(coupling, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(separation, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(separation, is filering better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(integration, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(integration, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(separation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(integration, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(attachment, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(coupling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)