court: appointment of is judges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, tribunal
Weight: 0.69
, school
Weight: 0.64
, court case
Weight: 0.63
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, justice
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
appointment of is judges 1.00
has nine judges 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, has nine judges)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(supreme court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(supreme court, appointment of is judges)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(supreme court, has nine judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(supreme court, has nine judges)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(court, appointment of is judges)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(court, has nine judges)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(court, has nine judges)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(court, has nine judges)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(court, has nine judges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(court, appointment of is judges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(court, appointment of is judges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supreme court, appointment of is judges)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(court, appointment of is judges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(supreme court, has nine judges)