court: be different from state to state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, tribunal
Weight: 0.69
, school
Weight: 0.64
, court case
Weight: 0.63
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, justice
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from state to state 1.00
be same from state to state 0.95
be different from district courts 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(court, be different from state to state)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(court, be same from state to state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(court, be same from state to state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(court, be different from district courts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(court, be same from state to state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(court, be same from state to state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(court, be different from district courts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(court, be different from district courts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(court, be different from district courts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, be different from state to state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(court, be different from state to state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(court, be different from state to state)