court: be involved in cases concerning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, tribunal
Weight: 0.69
, school
Weight: 0.64
, court case
Weight: 0.63
Siblings county court
Weight: 0.83
, supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, justice
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be involved in cases concerning 1.00
be involved in cases 0.92
apply concepts to cases involving 0.86
use past cases 0.83
hear cases 0.82
rule in cases 0.79
apply concepts to cases 0.77
get case 0.77
hear case 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, hear cases)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, hear case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(supreme court, hear cases)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(supreme court, hear cases)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(supreme court, hear case)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(supreme court, hear case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(court, be involved in cases)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(court, be involved in cases)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(court, apply concepts to cases involving)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(court, hear cases)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(court, use past cases)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(court, hear cases)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(court, apply concepts to cases involving)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(court, hear case)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(court, hear cases)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, use past cases)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(court, hear case)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(court, use past cases)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(court, hear case)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(court, use past cases)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(court, hear cases)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(court, hear case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(supreme court, hear cases)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(supreme court, hear case)