court: have original jurisdiction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, tribunal
Weight: 0.69
, school
Weight: 0.64
, court case
Weight: 0.63
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, justice
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
have original jurisdiction 1.00
have jurisdiction 0.95
obtain personal jurisdiction 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, have original jurisdiction)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, have jurisdiction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supreme court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(supreme court, have original jurisdiction)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(supreme court, have jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(supreme court, have jurisdiction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(court, have original jurisdiction)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(court, have jurisdiction)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(court, have jurisdiction)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(court, have jurisdiction)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(court, obtain personal jurisdiction)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(court, obtain personal jurisdiction)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(court, obtain personal jurisdiction)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(court, have jurisdiction)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(court, obtain personal jurisdiction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(court, have original jurisdiction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(court, have original jurisdiction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(supreme court, have jurisdiction)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(court, have original jurisdiction)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(supreme court, have original jurisdiction)