court: use past cases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, tribunal
Weight: 0.69
, school
Weight: 0.64
, court case
Weight: 0.63
Siblings county court
Weight: 0.83
, supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, justice
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
use past cases 1.00
be involved in cases 0.88
rule in cases 0.85
hear cases 0.84
apply concepts to cases involving 0.84
be involved in cases concerning 0.83
apply concepts to cases 0.81
get case 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, hear cases)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(supreme court, hear cases)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(supreme court, hear cases)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(court, use past cases)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(court, hear cases)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(court, hear cases)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(court, be involved in cases)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(court, be involved in cases)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(court, be involved in cases concerning)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(court, apply concepts to cases involving)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(court, hear cases)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(court, hear cases)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(court, apply concepts to cases involving)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(court, apply concepts to cases involving)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(court, apply concepts to cases involving)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(court, be involved in cases concerning)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(court, be involved in cases concerning)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(court, be involved in cases concerning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, use past cases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(court, use past cases)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, use past cases)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(supreme court, hear cases)