coverage: be in area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.54
, practice
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cover
Weight: 0.32
, reporting
Weight: 0.31
, preview
Weight: 0.31
, medicare
Weight: 0.31
, programming language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in area 1.00
be in bay area 0.85
be with other carriers in area 0.76
be with carriers in area 0.76
be along 5 in central valley 0.75
be in sf bay area 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(coverage, be in area)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in bay area)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coverage, be in bay area)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in sf bay area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be along 5 in central valley)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be with carriers in area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be with other carriers in area)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(coverage, be in sf bay area)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(coverage, be along 5 in central valley)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(coverage, be in bay area)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(coverage, be with carriers in area)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coverage, be along 5 in central valley)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in bay area)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coverage, be in sf bay area)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coverage, be with carriers in area)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(coverage, be with other carriers in area)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in sf bay area)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coverage, be with other carriers in area)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(coverage, be along 5 in central valley)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coverage, be with carriers in area)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(coverage, be with other carriers in area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(coverage, be in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(coverage, be in area)