coverage: be in jersey compared

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.54
, practice
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cover
Weight: 0.32
, reporting
Weight: 0.31
, preview
Weight: 0.31
, medicare
Weight: 0.31
, programming language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in jersey compared 1.00
be in new jersey compared 0.98
be in jersey 0.93
be in new jersey 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(coverage, be in jersey compared)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in new jersey compared)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in jersey)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in new jersey)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(coverage, be in new jersey compared)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(coverage, be in jersey)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coverage, be in new jersey)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(coverage, be in jersey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in jersey)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in new jersey compared)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(coverage, be in new jersey compared)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in new jersey)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(coverage, be in new jersey)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in jersey compared)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(coverage, be in jersey compared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(coverage, be in jersey compared)