coverage: be in tucson

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.54
, practice
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cover
Weight: 0.32
, reporting
Weight: 0.31
, preview
Weight: 0.31
, medicare
Weight: 0.31
, programming language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tucson 1.00
be between tucson 0.94
be at uc santa cruz 0.80
be in nyc 0.79
be in boston 0.79
be in southwest michigan 0.77
be in delaware 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(coverage, be in tucson)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(coverage, be between tucson)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(coverage, be at uc santa cruz)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(coverage, be at uc santa cruz)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be at uc santa cruz)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(coverage, be at uc santa cruz)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(coverage, be in boston)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(coverage, be in nyc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coverage, be in delaware)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coverage, be in boston)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in boston)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(coverage, be in nyc)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(coverage, be between tucson)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(coverage, be in delaware)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coverage, be in southwest michigan)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in nyc)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in delaware)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in boston)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in nyc)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(coverage, be in southwest michigan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in southwest michigan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in southwest michigan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in delaware)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(coverage, be between tucson)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be between tucson)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in tucson)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(coverage, be in tucson)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(coverage, be in tucson)