cpu: produce heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.62
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, chip
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings motherboard
Weight: 0.35
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, server
Weight: 0.34
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.34
, processor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
produce heat 1.00
generate heat 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(processor, generate heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, generate heat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(server, generate heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(server, generate heat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(server, generate heat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(microprocessor, generate heat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, generate heat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(processor, generate heat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(processor, generate heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cpu, produce heat)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cpu, generate heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cpu, generate heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cpu, generate heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cpu, generate heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cpu, produce heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cpu, produce heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(server, generate heat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(microprocessor, generate heat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cpu, produce heat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(processor, generate heat)