crab: be at pot

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shellfish
Weight: 0.67
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, predator
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
, crustacean
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hermit crab
Weight: 0.81
, hermit
Weight: 0.46
, lobster
Weight: 0.39
, shrimp
Weight: 0.38
, oyster
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at pot 1.00
be at cook pot 0.93
be at stew pot 0.90
be at crab pot 0.89
be at pot of boil water 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be at pot of boil water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(lobster, be at pot of boil water)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lobster, be at pot of boil water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(crab, be at pot)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(crab, be at cook pot)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(crab, be at crab pot)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crab, be at stew pot)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(crab, be at cook pot)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(crab, be at cook pot)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at cook pot)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(crab, be at stew pot)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(crab, be at stew pot)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at stew pot)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(crab, be at crab pot)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(crab, be at crab pot)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at crab pot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at pot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crab, be at pot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at pot)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lobster, be at pot of boil water)