cracker: be at cupboard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, staple
Weight: 0.56
, junk food
Weight: 0.53
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.33
, cookie
Weight: 0.33
, potato chip
Weight: 0.33
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, pretzel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cupboard 1.00
be at fridge 0.81
be at desk drawer 0.80
be find in pantry 0.76
be at pantry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(staple, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cracker, be at cupboard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(staple, be at pantry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cracker, be at cupboard)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(item, be find in pantry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cracker, be at cupboard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(item, be find in pantry)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(staple, be at desk drawer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(staple, be at pantry)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(staple, be at desk drawer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(staple, be at pantry)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(item, be find in pantry)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cookie, be at fridge)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(staple, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(staple, be at pantry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(item, be find in pantry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cookie, be at fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cookie, be at fridge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cracker, be at cupboard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cracker, be at cupboard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(staple, be at desk drawer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(item, be find in pantry)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(staple, be at pantry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cookie, be at fridge)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(staple, be at desk drawer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(item, be find in pantry)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cracker, be at cupboard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(staple, be at pantry)