cracking: be in crude oil fractions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.53
, cause
Weight: 0.51
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
, characteristic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings crack
Weight: 0.35
, tear
Weight: 0.32
, rubbing
Weight: 0.32
, breaking
Weight: 0.31
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in crude oil fractions 1.00
be in oil fractions 0.94
turn mixture from crude oil 0.90
be in oil refining 0.82
be in out oil refinery 0.79
be in oil refinery 0.78
be important in oil refinery 0.78
turn mixture from oil 0.78
be in oil industry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cracking, turn mixture from crude oil)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cracking, turn mixture from crude oil)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cracking, turn mixture from crude oil)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cracking, turn mixture from crude oil)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil fractions)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil fractions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cracking, turn mixture from oil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil fractions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cracking, turn mixture from oil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cracking, turn mixture from oil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cracking, turn mixture from oil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil fractions)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cracking, be important in oil refinery)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)